Christopher Columbus’s arrival to
North America started what would become the template for colonizing a country.
He came in search of riches? for the Spanish crown, but what he
found was vastly more valuable than that. But the fertile land he had
discovered was already home to a native population. His interactions with these
people immediately set a terrible precedent for how countries would treat the
people that could get in the way of having control of lands or resources that
they desire. What he sparked would eventually lead to Manifest Destiny in the
United States. The end result was a near-total re-settlement of the North
American continent. A fundamental aspect of this historical narrative, as
discussed by Tzvetan Todorov is how
Columbus’s discomfort with the Native American’s differences led him to almost
completely destroy their culture.
A key element that played into
Columbus’s view of the Native Americans is the way in which human beings
struggle to understand people who share different views, beliefs, or customs. Those
who aren’t similar to us tend to be viewed as different or lesser because we as
humans don’t feel we can connect with them as much. This is clearly Columbus’s inability to respect the native’s form
of ‘other’, coupled with his belief that his views were better, led him to
strip them of their culture and replace it with his. For example Todorov discusses
how Columbus sees their lack of clothing as animalistic in comparison to what
Europeans wore at the time. Columbus’s gold-hungry view and feeling of divine
right lead him to overlook the value of the Native American’s knowledge of the
land and worth as people.
Both in the specific case of
Columbus, and historically in the larger conflict between ‘us’ and ‘others’, a
major bone of contention is differences is religious beliefs. Being that
Columbus was just coming from Spain where they had successfully kicked the
Moors out of the Iberian Peninsula, the ‘successful’ spread of Catholicism was
fresh in his and the mind of others. The trials and tribulations of Luther and
the Reformation were still in Europe’s future so there was no doubt in Europe
of the supremacy of their Catholic beliefs. As shown by those events, even
small differences in religions challenge the most fundamental beliefs amongst
humans about life and death, and right and wrong. Religion often dictates a lot
about how people believe life should be lived. By easily labeling others as ‘infidel’ and
‘non-believer’, the worst of human nature springs to life. Unable to match the
disease, horses, and guns that the Europeans brought, the Native Americans were
given a life and death choice of whether or not they would stick to their own
beliefs or convert to Catholicism and submit to the ‘superior’ Columbus. Too
much conquering and bloodshed is done in the name of religion
This lack
of understanding and respect of cultures, religions, and people that are
different from what is considered “normal” to one human being has led to the
death of many peoples and their ideas. In the case of North America,
Christopher Columbus came in with the desire of gold, and the feeling of divine
direction, which lead to the near complete decimation of a whole continent of
people. The sense of superiority and
entitlement is dangerous because greed and righteousness leads people to act without
empathy for fellow people. Both Manifest Destiny and the feelings of the
Spaniards following their successes caused people to strip other human beings
of their culture, land, and livelihoods. In international relations today we
have continued, and will continue, to see this if we do not make a conscious
effort to better understand one another as individuals and value them as equals.
Amanda,
ReplyDeleteVery well written post! I think the emphasis you put on Columbus’ religious motivation as primary incentive to settle and “Europeanize” the Native Americans is very important. In my post I make the comparison of Columbus converting the Native Americans to Christianity to the U.S. and its push to spread democracy. Like you said, Columbus wanted to convert the Native Americans to Christianity because he felt his religion was superior to the Native Americans’ culture and he was therefore doing the Native Americans a favor by converting them. Just like today, we (the West) think we are doing non-democratic nations a favor by imposing our democratic beliefs and ideals on them. In the (over) 500 years between Columbus’ “discovering” of America and today, we find ourselves in a similar mission to Columbus: to impose our beliefs on those that are “different” however, our motivations have changed: Columbus was driven by religion and in 2015, we are driven by democracy.
Thank you Emily!
DeleteI too see the parallel to be drawn today with the West trying to change or impose our beliefs on not only the Middle-East but other places as well. I do wonder if there is a slight difference though, because our spread of democracy is in theory for the sake of peace, whereas Columbus's was for the sake of religion. Either way our democracy violates some religious tenets in Middle-Eastern countries so perhaps we should try to come up with a compromise.
Amanda,
ReplyDeleteWell thought blog post. Thething that I really liked was in your second paragraph, when you stated that humans tend to think less of a culture that is different them theirs. I think that there is more to this than just in our human nature. A large part Christianity is the spreading of Christianity, and when communism was at it's largest, one of its points was to convert others to communism. This is a theme that shows up in many ideologies and it is only trying to gain more followers. Therefore, when people who have ideologies that tell them to spread their beliefs and they encounter a different culture than they will try to convert those people. I don't believe it is human nature to try to convert other cultures, but I do believe it has been programed in some of us though ideologies and religions.
Thank you Ryan,
DeleteThough I do not think it is human nature to try and convert other cultures, I wonder if it is our ego that whatever we believe must be the best and therefore we think we should spread it to everyone. I really like the point you brought up about communism, I hadn't had thought about it that way. I think we also search for more people for our beliefs/religions/causes because people tend to view ideologies with more followers as more legitimate.
Hi Amanda,
ReplyDeleteGreat post!! Your comparison of Manifest Destiny and Columbus' relationship with the Native Americans is an excellent way to show how his actions had a lasting effect in the land he "discovered." Reading your post also made me think about today and the incidence of Islamophobia. The arguments over whether Islam is a religion of Peace or inherently oppositional to it is evidence of our severe lack of understanding of the religion. Furthermore, as he argument continues it seems that many, like Columbus, are more interested in finding evidence to support the claim they have already decided is true, rather than interested in learning the religion in its entirety without an ulterior motive. If we accomplished this, then I believe there wouldn't be so much conflict over the religion.
Amanda,
ReplyDeleteNice post. It's mind-blowing that people tend to forget about the lack of respect Columbus had for the Native Americans, and this ultimately led to forced assimilation among their culture. Even though what Columbus did was very wrong, some Americans probably ignore his wrong-doings, and instead focus on our success as a nation. As you mentioned, it led to Manifest destiny, and we were able to discover so many new things and ultimately became a pretty successful nation. We wanted to find land and resources, and that's what we did--we cleared out everything in our path. It's a humanistic question, really. I mean, do we care more about having respect for other cultures, or do we want to do whatever it takes to achieve success and develop as much as possible? I think this question can still be asked in the context of today's world. Being respectful is obviously the right thing to do, but it may not lead to success that we want. Columbus may have realized this, and leaders today probably do, too. In life, it's almost impossible to get what you want all the time, but if you really want it, you can do it by doing awful things. It's a catastrophe of the human nature, but one that must be paid attention to. People are greedy, and it sucks. I'm hoping this will change. In the future, we should respect other nations and their values while at the same time focusing on our own goals. If we can balance these objectives, we can pretty successful as a nation, and the world can be, too.