Wednesday, November 11, 2015

How baseball Explains the World

Will Chandler
November 11th, 2015
Shirk IR

Blog Post 4

On May 4th, 1869, the first professional baseball team, the Cincinnati Red Stockings played the Great Westerns of Cincinnati, and America’s past time became a business. In 1947, Jackie Robinson became the first black baseball player in the MLB. Jump forward about a 65 years, and the Kansas City Royals just defeated the New York Mets for the World Series title in front of an average 14.7 million fans. The two teams featured about 23 international players throughout the season in live game action. Overall, about 41% of all MLB players are of color (2015 Major League Baseball Racial and Gender Report Card). While this may seem like progress, there is still much evidence of racism in baseball, however it is a microcosm of globalization and its double edged abilities because baseball has been affected by globalization’s ability to disseminate information, exposure and mass scrutiny and deal with social issues on a national scale while avoiding actual mass violence.

 

Baseball shows us that racism is still inherent in people, however, under the pressure of masses for equality, it can disappear. The sacred, just mediators of baseball are the umpires. Yet they have fallen into the same bias and racist tendencies common around the world. “SMU found that home-plate umpires call disproportionately more strikes for pitchers in their same ethnic group…  the data suggest that racial bias is probably operating at a subconscious level, where the umpire doesn't even recognize it.” Racism is still common in our culture, as much as we may try to hide it, it exists at a subconscious level. However, there are way to minimize it’s effects. “Researchers found that umpires' racial biases diminished when they knew they were being monitored by the computer. Same thing for high-profile moments. During those important points in games when umpires knew fans were more carefully watching the calls, the racial bias all but vanished. Likewise, the same-race preference was less pronounced at high-attendance games, where umps knew there would be more crowd scrutiny”. When people are being more highly scrutinized, they are able to overcome these subconscious plagues, and behave in the right way. Globalization gives access to these resources we need in order to possess a positive pressure for equality. Just as 14.7 million viewers at home, all with access to instant replay positively influence umpires to make the correct call, regardless of bias, government and corporations around the world are similar effected by the internet and modern communication to clean up their act because due to globalization, they are held accountable for their actions by thousands of viewers around the globe.   

 

 

“You don’t belong here n*****. You hear me, why don’t you look in the mirror? This a white man’s game. Alright? Get that through your think monkey skull!”

-Opposing Coach in 42

 

Jackie Robinson faced extreme odds and violence when he became the first black player in the major leagues. He faced violent opposition and extreme prejudice by both fans, umpires and even teammates. The expansion of the baseball, from a backyard sport for fun, to a small business, quickly became a large scale operation as it popularity grew wildly throughout the 20th century. As more franchises popped up, and the pressure to win championships increased front offices, in the hunt for the best players began looking at new sources. While the sport grew in popularity in America, it also expanded around the world. Other groups quickly picked up baseball, it was especially popular among black youth, and an independent league, “The Negro Leagues” was even formed. However, the demand for the best players, spurred by its growing business and popularity caused the Brooklyn Dodgers to sign and play Jackie Robinson in 1947. This started a rush of incredible racism and brutality as the current race issue in America was put on the national stage. Jackie Robinson’s success lead to alleviated tensions and was a major example of flawed white American ethnocentricism.

 

"We're opening this game to everyone that can play. However, if you're going to come into our country and make our American dollars, you need to respect a game that has been here for over a hundred years..."
-Bud Norris

 

Since inception in 1869, baseball has spread out all over the World. From a young age, kids all over the globe have come to love and play “America’s pastime.” In fact, there is an international tournament held every year in Williamsport, Pa for American and international youth. Despite baseball’s identification as a purely American sport, more international teams have won the Little League World Series title, then American ones, despite an even American to International team ratio. This trend continues, as seen in the World Baseball classic, where the US has never finished in the top 3 places! And since its inception as an Olympic sport, the US has one just 1 gold medal, while Cuba leads the way with 3. Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, professional baseball is still seen as an American sport, and as such, there is a common sentiment that it should be played in an American way. Current MLB player Bud Norris, expresses this sentiment above, this extends off the field as well, “And that, dear Latino player, is a lesson you can apply to every single aspect of your life in American baseball: your music, your dress, your emotions, your playing style. If any of it ever offends one of the locals, the rationale is always, ‘Hey! America! Our country, our music, our money, our way!’" (Racism in Baseball isn’t going Anywhere). Sentiment among active American players, is that despite clear evidence to the contrary, baseball practices around the world are significantly inferior to the American style. In fact a common phrase in baseball when it comes to hot headed, flashy foreigners, is that are a danger to the game. Hot shot Cuban outfielder Yusiel Puig has been a polarizing example of this, as he allows his emotions to clearly enter into his play, this has been met with opposition as “staunch traditionalists argue for preserving the integrity of the game” (sportress of blogitude). The expansion of baseball, has led to racial backlash, othering and violence between white American traditionalists and different races and cultures around the world.

 

               The globalization of baseball has been full of positives and negatives. This is because globalization is inherently a double edged sword. While it puts pressure on countries because it holds them responsible for their actions, and allows social issues to be tackled without direct violence, it also can lead to racism and othering.         


“Maybe next time we will all wear 42, that way that won’t tell us apart.”

-Pee Wee “42”

13 comments:

  1. I'm sorry for funcky font and formatting, after I copy and pasted it from my word doc, I made some changes, and it totally messed with the format, and I don't really know how to work the tools as well on here, so I honestly don't know how to fix it. I apologize.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Will,

    Interesting...and even more up my alley than soccer! I will say that I think the reason the US doesn't win international competitions has more to do with a) they don't care about them all that much and b) baseball is a highly random game where the best team only wins like 55% of the time. Thus many individual games are coin flips and we can only tell 'best' over many, many games (more than seven).

    However, back to the point at hand. You hit on an interesting dynamic here. Do you think that baseball blunts racism by having it play out in an arena where there are no guns or do you think it simply reflects the idea that racism never went away in the US?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that it does a little bit of both. At first, racism was huge in sports, but I think that Americans soon realized that the only thing that they care about more then race, is winning, so over time, people have put aside their extreme views on race, and violence has stopped. In this respect, I think that sports have done a lot to prove to the world, that race is a human construct and there aren't any physical differences between the races. Ultimately this has led to improved relations. However, I think that racism is still very prevalent in the US, and the statistics about baseball prove that. We live in a much more accepting world then we did before, but just like the umpires, there is still a persisting sub conscious racism in the majority of people.

      Delete
  3. Will,

    I really liked this approach to breaking down the positive and negative aspects of Globalization. I have definitely seen what you are talking about it action. This summer I worked the marketing and promotions crew for the AAA affiliate team of the Colorado Rockies, the Albuquerque Isotopes. The majority of the players for this team are from outside the US. When more predominantly white teams from say the midwest would come for games the tensions in the stadiums where always high due to the lack of respect for the majority of my home town's team. I have also seen the affect that having more attention being paid, like the game being televised, that people tended to be more professional and level headed.
    It is sad, but I agree that the more people perceive that they are being watched the more fair they will be. In terms of Globalization maybe this will improve the treatment of people around the world.

    Nice post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First, I'm so jealous, that sounds like an awesome job!

      Second, that is really upsetting. I think this just really speaks to the horrible plague of racism. In a professional sport, at a high level (AAA), you'd think that the players, coaches, umpires and fans could all be level headed the whole time, but clearly, even in the MLB, there are issues with this. I just think that this is a microcosm of the real world, when people with power have the ability to take advantage of others, with little to no consequences, they usually will. I think this is what happens with unfortunately with race. However, as I discussed, when there is an audience, especially a big one, people often modify their actions. So perhaps there is hope, that with globalization, racism will lessen because the whole world can now often watch the actions of the individual.

      Delete
  4. Will, this is a very interesting post! Although I can’t say I know that much about baseball, it’s interesting that you were able to use another sport as an example of globalization (or lack of). You acknowledge that baseball is known as a very “American” sport, so could you argue that the racism found in baseball in Jackie Robinson’s day as well as in today’s world is a reflection of the issues in society? Like I said, I don’t know much about baseball and so I’m not sure where the sport is popular elsewhere around the globe, however it seems to me that the racism that exists in baseball in the U.S. is due to our long history of racism and thus our county’s history of racism is therefore reflected in this “All-American” sport.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that that's a pretty great point. While America is mostly a country of immigrants, Immigrants have always been attacked here. From hatred of Irish, to Italians, to Mexicans, the US has always tried to separate the "natives" from the immigrants. I think in many ways it is still doing that. As it is America's past-time, I feel, that it is viewed as a game that should be played by "Americans". At first this was simply white men. Soon, blacks began to play, and while there was backlash, eventually, and perhaps grudgingly, it was accepted because America began to see blacks as real Americans. In the world today, there is lots of scorn for leagues in the Dominican, Cuba and Japan. While great players have come over from these nations, proving their legitimacy, Americans don't consider these leagues to be nearly as good or real as baseball in the States. I think baseball, as being part of American culture, shows, what cultures are considered "American" and those that are not, are often looked down upon and not accepted as playing real baseball.

      Delete
  5. This is a really unique post. As an avid baseball fan, I take interest in this. Racism definitely still exists in baseball and we can't hide that fact.
    The Jackie Robinson issue is really interesting. Because of the scrutiny and hate he and other black players faced back in the day, there must be a mission to avoid that hate in this day and age. For this reason I think people are more excited to see international players in America. As you say in your first paragraph, international participation is growing in baseball, and people are beginning to realize that this is going to become the norm. Because of this realization, maybe, umpires may become less racist and grow accepting of all players.
    I think other nations win more than the U.S. is because baseball is more important to their culture. For example, there are several sports in the U.S. that have a strong market and carry a viewer interest, but in other countries sports like football aren't important. Other countries, such as Cuba for example, value baseball more than the U.S. Look at nations like Japan, too. Japan is simply a very very good baseball country, and they seem to have the edge in the international sphere, such as in the Little League World Series and World Baseball Classic. So, nations such as Japan place a great emphasis on baseball and develop a baseball culture. While admittedly I do not know a great deal about Japanese baseball, this is what would make sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your explanation makes a lot of sense. I think for the same reason, the US is not an elite power in mens soccer, because there are so many sports, the best athletes are filtered into many different sports, while in other countries, they might all be brought together to play on one sports team. I also, think that you are right, the expansion of baseball may lead to less racism, but I think it could also lead to more. However, if anything, it is likely that there will be more umpires of different ethnicity, which ultimately may make it the most fair. You make an interesting point about current baseball culture. It is true, baseball is a dying game in America, and on the rise in other places around the world, I would not be surprised if there are less and less Americans in baseball as time passes, and as such, perhaps the baseball capital of the world, may switch from here, to another nation.

      Delete
  6. Hi Will,
    Great post!! It's especially relevant right now, so thanks for writing on it. You perspective on globalization as a double edged sword is really interesting, and it made me think of another aspect of the topic. Even though it's called globalization, it really is one culture's practice that is imposed on the rest of the globe while always retaining its original cultural ownership. For effective globalization (with the understanding of it as the spread of an idea or practice around the world) I think that a practice, when spread around the globe, should be added to and enriched with all global cultures to take on a deeper significance and have longer lasting effects. For instance, Western culture, instead of being forced on other countries, should be allowed to mesh with and be shaped by other cultures to create a culture that has itself been globalized. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Will,
    Great post!! It's especially relevant right now, so thanks for writing on it. You perspective on globalization as a double edged sword is really interesting, and it made me think of another aspect of the topic. Even though it's called globalization, it really is one culture's practice that is imposed on the rest of the globe while always retaining its original cultural ownership. For effective globalization (with the understanding of it as the spread of an idea or practice around the world) I think that a practice, when spread around the globe, should be added to and enriched with all global cultures to take on a deeper significance and have longer lasting effects. For instance, Western culture, instead of being forced on other countries, should be allowed to mesh with and be shaped by other cultures to create a culture that has itself been globalized. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. haha. I like your optimism. And I think that ultimately, you may be right about that. However, culture is a really tricky thing. If it meshes with other things, it becomes it's own new culture, and as such, there can be many new cultures off of one original "globalized" culture. Also, due to ethnocentrism and personal bias, who's to say what makes a culture "better". I think this is a really good idea, and I am all for it, but I just don't think the world works quite in this way.

      Delete
  8. I really enjoyed reading this post. I think it is a great connection between the racism that is occurring in baseball and in the world today. I really like the points that you make about how an umpire will loose their racist tendencies when they know people are watching. This actually makes a lot of sense and applies everyone. Everyone when being watched will be far more careful about what they say when they know they are being watched, but with friends or family, racist tendencies may come out far more.

    ReplyDelete